Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: rwfromkansas
Not necessarily. Why isn't it possible that other things evolved later, but we had clotting from the beginning? I am not an evolutionist, but that is something that could be a logical explanation from their side.

Saying that we had clotting blood from the beginning, that it did not evolve is NOT an argument for evolution.

224 posted on 06/22/2003 8:20:09 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]


To: Jorge
True. They could exlain it away as not necessarily being an argument against it though; it could be neutral if their explanation is correct.

What I am more interested in knowing due to their explanation is how blood started (since in the earliest creatures according to evolutionists did not have blood). How the heck could it just "show up" with all the necessary parts coming together at ONCE? How on Earth could the different blood types just come together for different species?
264 posted on 06/22/2003 8:37:51 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("There is dust enough on some of your Bibles to write 'damnation' with your fingers." C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson