Well, since I won't ever go back to being a creationist again, I suppose it all balances out, doesn't it?
By the way, since you have cited all of those quotes in your previous articles I assume that you have access to all of those quotes you listed. Could you provide the context to the quotes by Stanley in post #41, and by the Field Museum in #31. I assume since you've cited them that you have access to the materials themselves...don't you? They are very obscure, and as such, I must ask. Thanks for any help you can give.
Well, since I won't ever go back to being a creationist again, I suppose it all balances out, doesn't it?
No..actually it depends on which proves to be the truth in the end.
I won't have to stand before God knowing that I believed and perpetuated a fraud designed to deny creation and smear God's word as a lie.
No..it definitely will not all be the same in the end.
Well, George Gaylord Simpson really was a big name in 1953. (But who knows if he meant what he's portrayed as meaning, given the lack of integrity in Creationist Quote Science? OK, we do know specifically about that one!
(Follow the preceding link and look how honest your quote wasn't, Jorge!)
And the Nebraska Man misinterpretation really was a big story of 1922...
And the Leakey's started finding Rift Valley hominids in the 1960s, the walking/amphibious whales started turning up in the 1980s, the Chinese feathered dinosaur finds were in the 1990s, the legged sirenian was just a few years ago ...