To: billbears
And the Constitution never once referenced said Articles nor mentioned perpetual. So it must have been a different form of government established, a voluntary one. Hmmmm....We the People, in Order to Form a More Perfect Union...
"More perfect" than what, pray tell?
150 posted on
06/12/2003 6:50:17 PM PDT by
Poohbah
(I must be all here, because I'm not all there!)
To: Poohbah
More perfect is not perpetual. More perfect insinuates that the holding bonds of perpetualness are broken and that the states would want to remain together voluntarily. However it does not insinuate that if the union between the states ever came to a point that they could no longer be together, that force would be used in making them remain
163 posted on
06/12/2003 8:57:57 PM PDT by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson