Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Gianni
Untrue. A war among factions of a single country is still called a civil war. Did Lincoln never refer to it as a 'war'? You'll have to do better than to deny that a war occurred.

Referring to it as the 'Civil War' didn't come into widespread use until the turn of the century. Prior to that it was officially referred to as War of Southern Rebellion. And a rebellion is what it was. There was no opposing country to declare war on, just the southern states. And President Lincoln had no need to go to congress for a declaration of war to try and quell a rebellion. He had all the authority he needed in the Militia Act.

1,068 posted on 07/01/2003 7:43:54 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 987 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Referring to it as the 'Civil War' didn't come into widespread use until the turn of the century. Prior to that it was officially referred to as War of Southern Rebellion.

Actually, reference to "the civil war" predates the war itself as this was the commonly used phrase to describe and warn against what both sides saw to be approaching in the years before it. The feds officially called it the "War of the Rebellion," the confederates called it variations upon the "war of northern aggression" and the sort, and early post-war writers tended to refer to it as either the "civil war" or "war between the states." Civil war has been favored over all the others in recent times if for no other reason than that it is the easiest to say and shortest to write.

1,072 posted on 07/01/2003 7:53:59 PM PDT by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1068 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson