[Texasforever]

The point is that some people around here think that it was okay for Bush to sign CFR because it was part of a larger conservative political strategy.

Because once the court rules it unconstitutional it is dead. The only thing Bush would have accomplished with a veto is postponing it until a democrat came into office to sign an even more unconstitutional bill.

[CWOJackson]

"...until a democrat came into office to sign an even more unconstitutional bill."

And possibly after having stacked the Supreme Court first.

[Fraulein]

Because once the court rules it unconstitutional it is dead. The only thing Bush would have accomplished with a veto is postponing it until a democrat came into office to sign an even more unconstitutional bill

...until the court ruled that law unconstitutional as well. So, tell me, where's the difference?