Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Consort
Sometimes we confuse facts with truth. New facts can undo a conviction whether or not those facts are the truth.

Herein lies the impasse. How can something be a fact if it isn't true? It would be considerably more accurate to say that alleged facts can undo a conviction whether or not those alleged facts are the truth.

247 posted on 05/14/2003 8:29:45 AM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]


To: inquest
It would be considerably more accurate to say that alleged facts can undo a conviction whether or not those alleged facts are the truth.

Exactly. The truth may never enter into any particular litigation at any particular time but the process will be carried out regardless.

250 posted on 05/14/2003 8:47:45 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson