KC is engaging in cross-thread non-sequitors to imply that some people support this type of behavior.
California pre-1967 or thereabouts, had sodomy (and other sexual perversion) statutes on the books that were enforced as well as they could reasonably be enforced, as was true in all 50 states. Although no one was harassed in their homes by "bedroom police," the citizens generally understood and accepted that sodomy was a vile act. There were no public masturbation events, abortion claimed a tiny fraction of the lives that are now disposed of and flushed down the abortion mill toilets, and AIDS, anal gonorrhea, hepatitis B, and other sodomy-related diseases were unheard of. The taxpayer was not being flogged to pay for wretched irresponsible sexual promiscuity.
The "sexual revolution" of the 1960s and 19970s changed all that and California became the model state for the sexual permissiveness that you defend. Now, among other things, California families are subjected to public mass masturbation events.
You say you don't support these things, but these things flow directly from the attitude that you have. Therefore, you support them in a very real and powerful sense.