Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Roscoe
Roscoe puts own foot in mouth yet again:

"This power is limited only by the requirements that such local laws not be in conflict with the State Constitution nor inconsistent with the general laws of the State."

And, of course, the State is limited by the requirements that such state & local laws must not conflict with those of our U.S. Constitution. [see Art. VI]

"The contention that having city laws regulating firearms violates the Second Amendment is also unsupported nonsense."

Whereupon roscoe rolls out the 'Presser/Adamson/Grimm decisions', well refuted pieces of unsupported judicial nonsense.

Rave on roscoe.

523 posted on 04/08/2003 7:18:45 PM PDT by tpaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies ]


To: tpaine
Whereupon roscoe rolls out the 'Presser/Adamson/Grimm decisions', well refuted pieces of unsupported judicial nonsense.

He refuses to see it. In his warped little world, Constitutions have less power than the laws writen under its contractualy authority.

Rave on roscoe.

Please, don't encourage him. He'll go in circles for days, trying to get the last word in, if you keep doing that.

541 posted on 04/09/2003 5:15:26 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson