Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: PatrickHenry
Every "transitional" was, in its day, a fully-developed, walking-around, eating, drinking, and reproducing species.

Yup, indeed, survival of the fittest and all that. The problem for evolution though is how does a creature become more fit by exchanging its forelegs or arms for wings when it cannot yet fly? The question is how the many changes required for making a bird a viable flying organism could have all taken place while making the species undergoing the changes more viable at each step. These are the questions which evolutionists always fail to answer and which they are totally unable to answer. In fact they are not even able to state the order in which the many different features of birds could have arisen (let alone show any evidence for such an order of transition). Again this is quite interesting since large transitions should have the most evidence for them.

682 posted on 03/16/2003 12:01:06 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies ]


To: gore3000
Main Entry: re·duc·tio ad ab·sur·dum

Pronunciation: ri-'d&k-tE-"O-"ad-&b-'s&r-d&m, -'d&k-sE-O-, -shE-, -'z&r-

Function: noun

Etymology: Late Latin, literally, reduction to the absurd
Date: 1741
1 : disproof of a proposition by showing an absurdity to which it leads when carried to its logical conclusion
2 : the carrying of something to an absurd extreme
683 posted on 03/16/2003 2:13:49 PM PST by f.Christian (( + God =Truth + love courage // LIBERTY logic + SANITY + Awakening + ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 682 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson