Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: VadeRetro
Isn't Archaeopteryx "just a modern bird?"

Aside from the fact that it had feathers, we do not know what it was. While feathers are the distinguishing characteristic of modern birds, we cannot say that Archaeopteryx was a bird. We cannot even say whether it could fly or not. Modern birds have quite a few adaptations for flight such as totally different lungs from all other animals and very light bones. We have no evidence of such in Archaeopteryx. Further, to put Archaeopteryx in the line of descent of birds is pretty desperate of evolutionists considering that while we have found many examples of Archaeopteryx, we have not found any examples of anything which could be considered its predecessor, nor anything like it for some 50 million years afterwards. So it is no proof of evolution at all.

679 posted on 03/16/2003 11:23:53 AM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 636 | View Replies ]


To: All
Everyone needs this blue barf bag right about now:


680 posted on 03/16/2003 11:27:47 AM PST by PatrickHenry (The universe is made for life, therefore ID. Life can't arise naturally, therefore ID.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 679 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson