If it were not 'absolute' then it is fair and proper to disagree with it and yes to attack it. Real scientists do that to all theories all the time. It is only the PSEUDO-SCIENCE of evolution that does not allow for disagreement with its tenets as this article (and many others in the past) show.
Further, the whole claim that evolution is subject to scientific revision is total nonsense. The central theme of evolution is materialism. Like all materialism it does not even bother to tell us how things come about, how they are ordered, how they arise. They just posit a totally unscientific 'randomness' as the cause of all things. That is why evolution can teach us nothing and why it should be kept out of classrooms. It is not science to say that things just 'happen'. Science is about cause and effect, about how things happen and evolution has nothing to teach us about that.
My, what a wonderful and outstanding "strawman" argument. Who are you going to sterotype next?
So what you are saying is ALL geoscientists and biologists and chemists etc. all practice PSEUDO-SCIENCE instead of proper science as we were taught in school. For the record, many geoscientists, biologists chemists etc. have, for many years, taken parts of the "theory" and applied "proper" scientific techniques to confirm or deny or amend parts of the theory. Properly trained scientists will not practice "pseudo-science". For if they do they will be wacked by other scientists such as me.
As I have told you "creation" is not a theory. It is an absolute belief that forms part of a religion. A person who believes in creation must, at all cost, conclude it to be true no matter what because God has stated so in the bible. Then that person will go out and seek the evidence and ignore any disputable evidence to uphold their conclusion of creation. For to disagree with Creation would mean a loss of God and the afterlife to a number of people. That's what faith is all about and completely the opposite of proper science.
The theory of evolution is just that - a theory. It is something that can be tested (using science) to see if it really is likely or needs to be amended or needs to be disgarded.
Take care.
hawk