I give up. No breakthrough is possible at this point.
Gore3000, I just can't keep parroting the same arguments and hope that you'll eventually catch on. The sad part is how many other people think that the ideas you keep proposing are in fact how evolution works. Please try to understand that you are not arguing against the actual proposed theory, but something you've constructed yourself
PH, if any of his arguments were actually against the real theory, this might be worth continuing, but he's stuck in his own version and I'm tired of trying to get him to change it.
Time to get some actual work done.
Professdor who wishes death for our soldiers.
Posted by f.Christian to finnman69
On News/Activism 03/31/2003 2:52 PM PST #35 of 35
Why is it these ... anthroplogy prfessors --- are always getting into trouble?
Welcome to the club.
Yup, you cannot refute my statements so you go the way of all the other losers of evolution and resort to insults.
What I have shown are contradictions in evolution, taking both sides of the question. One day talking as if species do not change their DNA at all (as when they compare DNA sequences to prove evolution) and the next day saying that species change all the time. One day they say that evolution is gradual, the next that it is sudden. Which is it? One day saying that necessity drives evolution yet claims that older species had no necessity to change. Which is it? Take a side instead of all sides. Just because a species exists does not mean that evolution did it.
As I have shown many times on this thread there are three proofs of evolution:
1. Insults.
2. Doubletalk
3. Lies
So now we have another question which evolutionists cannot answer:
IF SPECIES MUST TRANSFORM THEMSELVES OUT OF NECESSITY, HOW COME SO MANY HAVE NEVER NEEDED TO CHANGE??????????