Sorry, but I really found nothing different between this guy and a hundred other creation scientists I've read about. A lot of the same arguments we've heard a hundred times on these threads, and the same sort of pseudo-science. He is making the same mistake of twisting evidence to suit his ends.
I appreciate your efforts, but you were doing much better when you were sticking to a faith-based argument. When you try to use scientific arguments, they are all too often based on misuderstandings and misconceptions about science. Dataman and the rest keep making the same mistakes over and over again and do not seem to realise that they are not arguing against science, but a strawman version of it they've set up. I am tired of trying to explain it to them.
Then it must be true.
I pray that you have not chosen to close your mind to a different take on the evidence. There are many new articles posted by recent scientific discoveries in the links I provided. Also I included a link with a comprehensive compilation of the modern archeological discoveries related to biblical authenticity (accurate historicity) that your friends may not include in their studies.
We also tire of the scientific obscurity that continues to be presented by your perspective. i.e. We used to believe this, now we believe this, no wait now we believe this, or maybe it is that. Reviewing this thread I have seen NO logical information piecing together the evidence that supports evolution. Please point me to posts that you feel attempt to do this.
The links I provided contain hundreds of links to information that systematically refutes the logic used for the theory of evolution. Maybe you should first check what your opposition says before you cast it off as illegitimate. I am confident you haven't pursued a thorough investigation of support for Intelligent Design.
These links are provided for those who "have ears to hear", which I pray includes you.