[Diamond]

IDists who leap to an invalid inference of universal design from the particular of human design. It is not established that what we know about human design in any way applies to something designed by an Intelligent Designer

I do apologize for the intrusion into your remarks to cornelius. You are correct that what we know about human design cannot neccesarily be attributed to any other intelligent agency. Yet, if we observe similar phenomena, what are we to make of it? What demarcation criteria can be proposed distinguishing science for what you apparently regard as non-science?

Cordially,

[the_doc]

With regard to the basketball and ice crystal, I would say that it is transcendentally obvious that these things are designed. The fact that others will not agree with me won't deter me from asserting that. The Creator agrees with me.

[Nebullis]

What demarcation criteria can be proposed distinguishing science for what you apparently regard as non-science?

None. And you'll find that the_doc (and, by extension, God), agrees with me.