[general_re]

#6

The person in the picture should give you some sense of scale for the featured structure...

[Diamond]

Man, I hope that's not a dung heap.

Cordially,

[PatrickHenry]

Updated links:

Test object 1. Diamond's answer in post 7.
Test object 2. Diamond's answer in post 33 and 62.
Test object 3. Answer at post 111 and 124.
Test object 4. Answer at 166 and 174.
Test object 5. Answer at 181.
Test object 6. Answer at _________.

[PatrickHenry]

Permit me to offer to Diamond, in connection with his not-yet-posted response to object #6 (which can be seen at post 202), what he said in connection with object #5:

Same answer as #4. Design. For the pretty much the same reasons. The pattern is contingent, that is, it indicates a choice of choosing certain things and ruling out others, and the pattern is highly improbable by chance.
181 posted on 03/07/2003 2:45 PM EST by Diamond

I really am interested to see if a consistent method employing consistent criteria can distinguish between natural and designed objects.

[Diamond]

Sorry for the slow response. My pastor died this afternoon at 1;30 after battling cancer for over 3 years. It's a large church, and amidst our grief and joyful worship, I've got some work to do for the church on sound in the next couple of days. Please be patient.

That large mound of bits and pieces of earth held together by adhesive can only be the result of design. If you need the rationale I will attempt to give it tomorrow am. Thanks for your patience.

Cordially,

[Diamond]

Fire away, general!

It's ok to hit me with another pic. Really. I can use the valuable, thought-provoking exercise with my FRiends.

Cordially,