[CCWoody]

We're "in the stream" of four-dimensional, finite existence.... ~ betty boop

I thought I might point out to you that it is impossible for us to be in a four-dimensional existence. Why do I say that? Well, we live in a just so inverse cubed not an inverse quad universe. Think about that.

Given that I am correct about that you might out to consider that I am also correct when I point out that your existence is also not finite.

Building up a proof (or lack thereof) of a universal conscious designer on the basis of currently-available empirical evidence subject to falsification tests hardly strikes me as being adequate to the problem of deciding whether the universe is intelligently designed or not. All it can tell us about is ourselves -- or so it seems to me. ~ betty boop

I'd also like to point out that the Design Inference is based upon what we actually do know whereas Evolution is a theory of speculations about what we don't know. This leaves me standing upon a firm foundation.

If I am able to demonstrate the existence of a single irreducibly complex system, then I win this "game". Evolution has no possible explaination for such a system. Only we Creationists do.

Woody.

[atlaw]

You said: "I'd also like to point out that the Design Inference is based upon what we actually do know . . . "

What do we "know" that forms the basis for the design inference?