Replies

Most of these layers were formed from below as the earth cooled --- bubbled ...

and then this mixture // 'batter' protruded hills and buttes (( cambrian layers // plates on the tops )) through the cracks and holes from below !

This wouldn't be hard to prove ...

plate edges // cracks would match mountain // hill sides ---

also butte (( canyon sides // layers too ))layers (( thicker )) would match underground layers (( thinner )) ...

this is all self evident --- obvious !

You just have to unlearn the evo hoax // ruse !

d_i_p ...

To: VadeRetro

Could you possibly be anymore condecending? I have the RNA World webpage bookmarked on my computer! It makes my point much better than I can make it. In big bold letters at the top is states "Nobody understands the origins of life. If they say they do they are probably trying to fool you." Which is my point. Getting from Lizards to birds is a huge leap for which there is but scant evidence. But in reality that's the least of your problems! It's also certainly not anything Darwin could address. That's my point. Darwin's theory is passe! It's hack science. It's 100+ years old, yet we still hang onto it as if it were a life-raft!

1082 posted on 02/27/2003 3:02 PM PST by Darwin_is_passe (Time is irrelevant to evolution)

fC ...

The only logical explanation of the geeologic column // geography ...

Most of these layers were formed from below as the earth cooled --- bubbled ...

and then this mixture // 'batter' protruded hills and buttes (( cambrian layers // plates on the tops )) through the cracks and holes from below !

This wouldn't be hard to prove ...

plate edges // cracks would match mountain // hill sides ---

cambrian plate residuals on the tops ---

also butte (( canyon sides // layers too ))layers (( thicker )) ...

would match underground layers (( thinner )) ---

this is all self evident --- obvious !

You just have to unlearn the evo hoax // ruse !