[f.Christian]

Why are there no pre cambrian fossils ?

[Buckeye Bomber]

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/07/0719_crustacean.html

If you bothered with science, you'd know that evolution has an answer for this. I see three ways of this discussion going now:

1) You'll call National Geographic an evil socialist magazine.

2) You'll ignore my posting and continue to be crazy. Or do some little thing where I equal evil or some gibberish like that. Or a little of both.

3) You'll say that the scientific evidence is flawed because science doesn't have some sort of Gospel truth which it is dead set on. Get it, Gospel truth! It's funny!

Here are a few more websites about pre-cambrian fossils:
http://www.nmnh.si.edu/paleo/shale/
http://www.3d-fossils.com/earth_sciences/paleontology/fossils/precambrian.html (with pictures, since your english seems to not be so good)
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/gish-exposed.html (Quotes from a creationist admitting he thought that there were no pre-Cambrian fossils, and later found that to be false)
http://geol.queensu.ca/museum/exhibits/ediac/ediac.html
http://www.uni-muenster.de/GeoPalaeontologie/Palaeo/Palbot/seite1.html

I changed my mind. You'll probably either say that Germans and Australians have nothing to add to science, or just ignore this. You truly haven't done your homework.

[Buckeye Bomber]

There is evidence of pre-Cambrian fossils. Now what? Did I win? Or do I get another ranting post where you post the same drivel you've used in every other post I've ever read by you on Free Republic? What will it be....