To: atlaw
I believe its curriculum would be the same as it is today, except it would not discount the creation theory, but would be inclusive. Intelligent Design and Creationism are about the same thing, with more intellectual posits and nuances in the Intelligent Design discourse. There would still be evolutionists, creationists, and some who combine the two.
There are many scientists that refute some of the Darwinian/evolution "facts" that have been in scientific schoolbooks for decades. Also, I don't believe that discussing ALL theories of how we got here is anything but tolerant,free education. The "fact" is that all the evolution "facts" just don't add up, and the Evolution Only crowd doesn't want that pointed out.
Creationists are about a lot more than "God did it, I don't have to discuss it, period. How about a little less PC and a lot more tolerance?
Vaudine
184 posted on
02/24/2003 6:50:39 PM PST by
vaudine
To: vaudine
I believe its curriculum would be the same as it is today, except it would not discount the creation theory, but would be inclusive.
What exactly is "creation theory"?
To: vaudine
Which Theory of Creation would you present? The one about the Flute Playing Dragon or the one about Saturn hovering over the North Pole? How do you decide which Creationist Theory to use?
209 posted on
02/24/2003 9:28:10 PM PST by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson