[Fred Mertz]

You wait and see how this story ends up!

Todd will be correct again. Watch and see.

And quit throwing out the liar line. It makes you look like a little, cruel, petty person.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

Todd will be correct again.

Bwahahahahahaha.........Talk about comic relief.

[Howlin]

Todd will be correct again

So I should put you down as saying Bush and al-Arian were personal friends?

Fine by me.

[Howlin]

He is a liar.

[hchutch]

Right now, I see a lot of unsubstantiated crap - most of it coming from someone who doesn't seem to have gotten over the (justified) dumping of Trent Lott.

He has been asked to cite where Gaffney provided proof for the allegations he made at CPAC, serious allegations aimed at a pair of White House staffers. None seems to have been forthcoming. It appears to me that these staffers were attacked by Gaffney because they were Moslem.

Not only should that offend anyone who believes in freedom of religion, but Article VI, Clause 3 prohibits the use of a "religious test" as a qualification to hold office or a public trust (which can be interpreted to mean government employment).

Gaffney apparently has NOT provided any proof to back up his allegations. Norquist called him on it, and demanded an apology. Gaffney has refused to provide one, and Norquist then took some actions in response to Gaffney's refusal to apologize or provide proof.