Look, I disgree with your stance that drug laws are good -- especially WRT federal drug laws. The exact analog is alchohol, and how we, the US of A, have carefully tread the line of federal regard for alchohol and alchohol use. From the whiskey rebellion, to the temperance movement, to *Constitutional* prohibition, to that amendment's rescinding. The LAW was respected.
You seem to hold that the drugs (all sorts of which, btw) that are federally banned are so dangerous that the clear terms and history of the Constitution shoould be ignored if that is what is needed to ban them. And you also have held that discussion counter to that theory is trivial, ignorant, unwise.
But you haven't marshalled much more than cyncism, spite and ad hominem to make your arguments -- and any fact or logic you do bring forward, gets buried under that poor packaging. You can do better, or at least change your screen name -- say to "CitizenJackson".