Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: SarahW
It would be rationalizing, but understandable, for the dad to say, better to make Jackson pay this way and make sure my kid is going to have a secure future, than to make him go through a court proceeding that will tear him to pieces and doesn't guarantee any kind of compensation.

I don't buy it. First...why do you say the kid would be torn to peices? Then so would Jackson right? Also, again...selfish to take money and run...without wanting to stop him from others....EVEN IF IT MEANT LOSING MONEY. SO you are saying the money is more important than stopping him and proving your accusations. Was there ever a lie detector test?

42 posted on 02/08/2003 7:28:05 PM PST by Sungirl (>^..^< Take the money and run......I don't care about anyone but me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Sungirl
Sarah is right totally! As a father, he is more loving toward his son by guaranteeing his future with the money, making Michael pay ($25M was HUGE to him), and not letting his son get torn to pieces by the legal system. You don't get it. The system is designed to destroy the victims. The father was right.
44 posted on 02/08/2003 7:31:46 PM PST by Office Manager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Sungirl
Selfish? He was raped by the freak. He deserves to be compensated for the loss of his innocence and the emotional and physical damage that Jackson inflicted.
46 posted on 02/08/2003 7:35:17 PM PST by Jael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: Sungirl
First...why do you say the kid would be torn to peices? Then so would Jackson right?

Jackson is a grown man who can reap what he sows. He is not, despite his best efforts, 12, and he wasn't then either. (That's kind of the point.)

A child is another matter. The option of settlement with a guaranteed outcome and no obligation to subject the child to a trial and all that entails, would have to be seriously weighed by any parent who gave a damn about his offspring.

Protecting other's interests at the expense of your own child's best interests is what you would do, no matter what?

You can't be a parent.

Like I said, it would be very easy to rationalize that Jackson had been publicly exposed, the settlement speaks for itself, and that the world has been warned. Your child is guaranteed that Jackson pays for his abuse. Your child will have security, and will not have to be subjected to a high-publicity ordeal, or have to face his abuser or his lawyers in open court. It was reasonable for the Dad to agree Jackson would settle a great deal of money on the boy, and that would be the end of the civil matter. The criminal case is not closed, BTW.

65 posted on 02/08/2003 8:07:41 PM PST by SarahW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson