Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye
Yes, I do own a gun. That's apples and oranges. Do you believe in God?
131 posted on 02/01/2003 4:19:44 AM PST by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: exnavy
Yes, I do own a gun. That's apples and oranges.

It is not apples and oranges. The precedents being set by the WOsD's that throw the 4th, 5th, 9th and 10th Amendments out the window by EO and legislation from the bench will eventually be used to apply federal gun laws and other laws. The unratified 17th Amendment has usurped the Constitutional authority of the State making it powerless to enact and enforce its own laws as proscribed by the Constitution and powerless to defend against unConstitutional laws applied against it by the fedgov.

The rule of law by Constitution is dead. The law is made and applied by courts, legislations and EO's and PDD's with no true recourse. What recourse is there when the USSC simply refuses to hear a case? What recourse is there when the USSC redefines the meaning of the Constitution at its pleasure?

"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression: for if he violates this duty, he establishes a precedent that will reach unto himself." - Thomas Paine

You have done your duty to defend this nation from its physical enemies, and I thank you for that, but you now abdicate your responsibility to defend the very principles this nation was founded upon. Having allowed and promoted the rotting of this nation from within your service will have been in vain. Liberty defended only for those you feel are worthy of it is no liberty at all but a prison of your own making. When the things you find worthy of defending from taxation, regulation and prohibition come under the jealous eye of the almighty fedgov no one will step forward to defend you.

At present no court in this nation below the Supreme Court allows the 2nd Amendment to be cited in defense of the act of keeping and bearing a firearm. The law of the lower jurisdiction rules by disallowing Constitutional argument. The reverse has been applied in Ed Rosenthal's case, the law of the State is barred from federal court as irrelevant by dint of jurisdiction. All quite legal.

Hang on to your gun. But I advise you to never admit that you have it ever again. One stroke of the Presidents pen may make you a felon. Mention of possession of a firearm may soon make you guilty of a hate crime. Children are already being trained that even an image of a gun is a hateful thing. WOD precedent makes possession of a prohibited thing sufficient cause for forfeiture of all your real property. The WOsD's has also brought us the noknock warrant. Put another way - an unannounced inspection of a citizens premises based on suspicion. The WOsD's has done away with the need for probable cause and warrant secured by affadavit. Your neighbor will simply call the unofficial "TIPs" line and say "I think I heard him talking about guns with a friend."

None of this is outrageous now. It has already been made acceptable by precedent. There is no hew and cry about no knock warrants. No hew and cry about midnight visits from black suited warriors. No question that mere implication must certainly imply guilt. And the need for unquestioned surveillance has been established and accepted. All paved by the WOsD's.

Did you say something about believing in God? You fool. Only a few years ago the FBI circulated a tip sheet to local PD's of things to look for when making a stop that included Bibles as indicators of possible rightwing terrorist involvement.

150 posted on 02/01/2003 10:39:18 AM PST by TigersEye (Democrat - the abortion party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson