Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Guru of Ganja" (Ed Rosenthal) convicted of marijuana cultivation
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 01/31/03 | DAVID KRAVETS

Posted on 01/31/2003 3:28:07 PM PST by MikalM

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:41:45 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

A federal jury Friday found Ed Rosenthal, the author of how-to-grow books on marijuana and how to avoid the law, guilty of marijuana cultivation and conspiracy charges.

Deliberating for a day, the 12-member jury concluded that Rosenthal, the self described "Guru of Ganja," was growing more than 1,000 plants, conspiring to cultivate marijuana and maintaining a warehouse for a growing operation. He faces a maximum life term when sentenced June 4.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: libertarians; loseraareusers; usersarelosers; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 521-526 next last
To: Roscoe
I've no transcript so why bother? You've already stated that I've got to show you the transcript.
201 posted on 02/01/2003 5:58:38 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Boot Hill
knock it off.
202 posted on 02/01/2003 5:58:39 PM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
Ah yes, one outed Fed speaks.

Those words only apply to a moral government following moral laws. Nice try though.

203 posted on 02/01/2003 5:59:39 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

Comment #204 Removed by Moderator

To: Cultural Jihad
The moral-liberal LP Brownshirts want to prohibit prohibitions

Precisely what the FOUNDERS were after. Maximizing freedom.

205 posted on 02/01/2003 6:05:33 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass
I would disagree with your assessment. When we have laws which discourage the breaking of the Commandment against stealing, we do so not to make moral people, or to enforce morality onto those who do not share it.

When would-be bank-robbers decide to walk away from a caper, we don't wring our moralizing hands that these miscreants hadn't seen the light. No. Society is content enough that they decided to walk away from doing evil today.


L.P. founder P.T. Barnum, cases a joint with Mumbles and Scarface.

206 posted on 02/01/2003 6:12:21 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55

And that is why they were big on piety and morality, which alone are the foundations of liberty.

207 posted on 02/01/2003 6:28:11 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
I would disagree with your assessment. When we have laws which discourage the breaking of the Commandment against stealing, we do so not to make moral people, or to enforce morality onto those who do not share it.

Of course, we have laws against stealing because such an act deprives another of their right to property.

Laws against the possession or use of marijuana are, indeed, designed to "enforce morality onto those who do not share it," since the mere use or possession of marijuana deprives no other person of his Constitutionally-enumerated rights. The only possible justification for such a law is either that smoking pot itself is immoral or that doing so may lead to some future immoral act (most which can be imagined are likely already prohibited by law).

My Church holds that it is never moral to do evil so that good may result. Depriving someone of his liberty so that some future imagined immorality does not occur is the worst sort of evil I can imagine.

"God willed that man should be 'left in the hand of his own counsel,' so that he might of own accord seek his Creator and freely attain his full and blessed perfection by cleaving to him."

208 posted on 02/01/2003 6:31:32 PM PST by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Trailerpark Badass
No one is preventing you from blowing dope. Go blow dope to your heart's content.

Ed did. For many years.

209 posted on 02/01/2003 6:34:02 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator; DAnconia55
Pointing out factual inconsistencies in a poster's stated positions is now a cause for deleting posts? For instance, if a poster claimed to be a Democrat on one thread, but now claims to be a Republican on this thread, we can't point out the inconsistency? With all due respect, AM, I think you may have jumped the gun here.

--Boot Hill

210 posted on 02/01/2003 6:38:06 PM PST by Boot Hill (February 1st)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
And that is why they were big on piety and morality, which alone are the foundations of liberty.

Yes indeed. Back when they wouldn't have allowed a Federal Law banning a plant.

As opposed to our immoral legislators who now do.

Glad you've come around.

211 posted on 02/01/2003 6:58:45 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55
So who is keeping you from blowing dope?
212 posted on 02/01/2003 7:01:00 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
So who is keeping you from blowing dope?

No one, since I don't obey immoral laws.
But who said I did?

I don't smoke crack either, but wouldn't let an immoral law stop me if I wanted to.

213 posted on 02/01/2003 7:02:06 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
I also don't frequent prostitutes, or gambling casinos, but know that laws against these are immoral too.

But I do want to go to Atlantic City once. For gambling. Not hookers.

214 posted on 02/01/2003 7:03:48 PM PST by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Lord Voldemort
Singin' in the bathtubbbb ...
Getting raped along the way?
215 posted on 02/01/2003 7:05:25 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
No one is preventing you from blowing dope. Go blow dope to your heart's content.
Ed did. For many years.

He did? Got something? An interview of him stating so...an arrest...a picture...? Anything?
216 posted on 02/01/2003 7:08:54 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Lord Voldemort
I see you've already got you're SOAR.
217 posted on 02/01/2003 7:09:51 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

Comment #218 Removed by Moderator

Comment #219 Removed by Moderator

To: philman_36
Who is preventing you from blowing dope?
220 posted on 02/01/2003 7:18:39 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 521-526 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson