Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H; IncPen; eagleye; Jim Robinson
Yes, the owner of this site agrees with my position on the WOD.

Are you going to tell him to go to Amsterdam?

Can I ask you a question? Please be objective.

This is the second time that you all on the pro-drug side on this thread(EagleEye was the first I beleive around reply #86) have implied that "the owner" agrees with you.

JMO, but can't you all on the pro-drug side leave "the owner" out. You, like I, have no idea what he thinks and believes and to pull out "the owner" "crutch" that I read all too often on these types of threads shows your perpensity, IMHO, to hide, behind another person, instead of your own arguements, Ken H.

319 posted on 01/30/2003 3:57:34 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies ]


To: Ken H; Eagle Eye; IncPen
For the record, Eagle Eye's implication that the "owner" of FR "agrees" with Eagle Eye is to be found in reply #85 of this thread.
321 posted on 01/30/2003 4:02:51 PM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]

To: Dane
Can I ask you a question? Please be objective.

Ask away.

This is the second time that you all on the pro drug side of this thread have implied that "the owner" agrees with you.

IMO, calling the anti-WOD side of the debate "pro-drug" is not objective.

Be that as it may, I can only go by what JR has written and he has written against the Federal WOD.

Two posts mentioning this on a thread of over 300 replies does not show a propensity to hide behind others' opinion, in my opinion.

I have given my own opinions and arguments in nearly every post as have most others here.

Aren't you using George Soros as a crutch in the same way to refute the antiWOD arguments as the anti-WOD posters are using JR to support theirs?

326 posted on 01/30/2003 4:22:16 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]

To: Dane
Just because you don't know or you refuse to admit that you know where JR stand on the WoD doens't mean that he hasn't spoken on the issue and that some of us don't know what he said.

Basically, he doesn't like drug abuse, doesn't advocated drug abuse, does not advocate legalization, but also doesn't like the current WoD.

JR came out on this when some of the WoD threads got real nasty and he wanted everyone to cool off. That was about the time that Kevin Curry posted a thread calling some of us warlocks and you were really into that green-faced guy.

Take step one and admit that there are those that don't use drugs but don't agree with the WoD. It will be a big step in your healing process.

327 posted on 01/30/2003 4:23:42 PM PST by Eagle Eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]

To: Dane; tpaine
You, like I, have no idea what he thinks and believes...
He's stated his views and they've been linked several times to several threads. Are you really going to try convincing everyone that you've never read his views when they've been given?
I believe tpaine might be able to help you out.
328 posted on 01/30/2003 4:24:43 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson