1 posted on
01/30/2003 6:38:26 AM PST by
MrLeRoy
To: *Wod_list
Wod_list ping
2 posted on
01/30/2003 6:38:42 AM PST by
MrLeRoy
("That government is best which governs least.")
To: MrLeRoy
This judge is obviously a drug-addled pothead, 'cause only such types favor reform of federal drug laws...
3 posted on
01/30/2003 6:39:51 AM PST by
dirtboy
To: MrLeRoy
This judge is obviously a druggie . . .
4 posted on
01/30/2003 6:41:51 AM PST by
realpatriot71
(legalize freedom!)
To: MrLeRoy
The next day, the man's 11-year-old grandson brought him three marijuana cigarettes, Kane said. Anybody have this kid's beeper number?
7 posted on
01/30/2003 6:48:56 AM PST by
Wolfie
To: MrLeRoy
America's war on drugs is costly, ignorant and doesn't work, a federal judge said Tuesday. Gee...what was your first clue Sherlock?
11 posted on
01/30/2003 6:54:04 AM PST by
unixfox
To: MrLeRoy
Of course the dirty little secret of this thread is that Judge Kane was appointed in 1977, that means appointed by Jimmy Carter.
13 posted on
01/30/2003 6:55:11 AM PST by
Dane
To: MrLeRoy
Last I looked, booze and smokes are still legal - how much of a deterrent is that to keeping kids from doing them?
30 posted on
01/30/2003 7:23:49 AM PST by
trebb
To: MrLeRoy
The thing I like best about your posts is that they reflect your wide variety of interests.
35 posted on
01/30/2003 7:40:30 AM PST by
IncPen
( God as my witness I thought turkeys could fly!)
To: MrLeRoy
bttt
41 posted on
01/30/2003 7:43:37 AM PST by
lodwick
(Wishing a superior day to all the Guild.)
To: MrLeRoy
Interesting story!
167 posted on
01/30/2003 10:06:49 AM PST by
TLBSHOW
(just a internet liberal; basher that is hated by the leftwing nuts!)
To: MrLeRoy
If memory serves, Judge Kane was the same jurist who read the IRS the RIOT ACT after discovering the IRS had PLANTED an IRS agent on a jury in a tax case in his court. I seem to recall that he declared a mistrial in the case, subjecting himself to some serious IRS scrutiny of HIS taxes.
You DO know, don't you, that because judges are also tax filers, most of them do just about whatever the IRS and US Attorneys "suggest" in those cases? One or two who refused found themselves in prison.
Judge Kane got it EXACTLY RIGHT and I wish there were thousands more like him. That there are not does not bode well for the future of due process here.
To: dirtboy
LOL! Dirtboy. I was rereading the thread from the beginning and what do I see as the first keyword, BETTERSANETHANDANE.
LOL! You are that juvenile and petty. Oh well I if I am going to have petty and personal insults thrown at me that would warm Hillary and Daschle's heart, I guess I am getting to you all and I wear your "insult" as a badge of honor.
221 posted on
01/30/2003 11:20:06 AM PST by
Dane
To: Wolfie; vin-one; WindMinstrel; headsonpikes; philman_36; Beach_Babe; jenny65; AUgrad; Xenalyte; ...
WOD Ping
222 posted on
01/30/2003 11:21:29 AM PST by
jmc813
To: MrLeRoy
Among the 300+ posts, I read a handful of posts that contained shreds of rational thinking. The rest (the majority) however, are the same old tired arguments outlined
here.
To: MrLeRoy
"Our national drug policy is ... wholly ignorant of the compelling force of forgiveness," Amen!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson