[editor-surveyor]

"Perhaps you didn't finish Duesberg's book either."

Perhaps you didn't understand his book. - Yes, I have more than finished it. I have typed in quotes from it ad infinitum, but most lack the desire to delve in and understand what is really happening.

Peter's conclusion is that most of the "AIDS deaths" in Africa never even happened; they were based on the assumption that empty houses were due to dead people, rather than the fact that they simply had to leave them due to drought and food shortage and move elsewhere.

Most inportantly, he demolishes the absurd idea that AIDS is contageous completely.

[George W. Bush]

Peter's conclusion is that most of the "AIDS deaths" in Africa never even happened; they were based on the assumption that empty houses were due to dead people, rather than the fact that they simply had to leave them due to drought and food shortage and move elsewhere.

Like some of the African doctors and researchers say: "If all these millions of people have died, where are the graves because we don't cremate our dead?"

Where are the graves?

Most inportantly, he demolishes the absurd idea that AIDS is contageous completely.

I've been aware of Duesberg's work since the mid-Eighties. As the original discoverer of retroviruses, his work has been studiously ignored because it calls into question the entire AIDS industry and all the money associated with it.

But I don't consider that he has proved his case either. I wouldn't be at all surprised if he is proven pretty much correct in the end. I think his position has only gotten stronger over the years but has not yet reached the level of an undeniable proof. So the current AIDS charade continues.