Replies

Let's see, G3K still claims that ID is science, Fchristian of course throws in his sometimes witty and sometimes just plain untranslatable posts.

G3K claims that it is impossible to go from egg laying to live birth, in any steps at all, because I guess if one thing changes, the whole system somehow quits working, still am clueless as to how he came to this conclusion.

Radioastronomer and Physicist have both placed their scientific minds to the question of whether evolution was indeed science, and they of course said YES, Evolution is TRULY science.

Of course, G3K and others of his ilk continue to claim that it is not.

I have made a few fopahs, and of course G3K has jumped on them like some kind of cat, and of course PH is having a good time with his comments, especially his purity of essence posts, you'll just have to find it and follow it, because it really is a kick in the pants.

Oh and we have another face that has been debating G3K quite well, Dan Day, and it seems dataman is frustrated, oh and G3K continues to think that we can't get there from here, even after 900 posts and 100 of them refuting what he has been saying, so he took ALL his posts and tossed them together about 10 posts back to confuse the issue and of course hopefully wear us down to a point where if he gets the last word, it means of course that he won the argument.

That's a pretty reasonable synopsis, but they really want to discuss religion as if it's science, and it really gets frustrating.

Oh well, where's the philosophy thread where we can discuss religious theories and opinions? If you don't know of one, then we need to start one and invite the creationists over, then at least they would be in the right type of thread for their belief structure, and won't be making fools of themselves by calling it science.

Thank you so much for your summary of the thread!

Oh well, where's the philosophy thread where we can discuss religious theories and opinions?

There is a very good philosophy thread going on Science and Spirituality. Right now betty boop, beckett, Phaedrus, VadeRetro and Cornelis are deep (and I do mean deep) into the discussion.

Perhaps we ought to have a more general "laying of the cards?" Would you mind summarizing your religious theory or opinion?

I have made a few fopahs,

Including the most nails-on-the-chalkboard misspelling of "faux pas" I've *ever* seen... LOL.

That's a pretty reasonable synopsis, but they really want to discuss religion as if it's science,

...and science as if it's a religion. Meanwhile we try to be old fashioned and discuss religion as religion and science as science.

Oh well, where's the philosophy thread where we can discuss religious theories and opinions?

Actually, I've seen several threads head that direction after starting out on a more specific religious-based topic.