[MEGoody]

"If you have a TRUE SCIENTIFIC theory that would compete with evolution for scientists attention, I will be the first one to say, GREAT, let's do it, because the students should be allowed to see competing SCIENTIFIC Theories."

I'm glad you are so open minded. Then you would not be opposed to information being presented which some say pokes holes in the theory of evolution - as long as it is scientific information, of course, right?

[general_re]

Then you would not be opposed to information being presented which some say pokes holes in the theory of evolution...

What did you have in mind?

[Aric2000]

some say pokes holes in the theory of evolution

I would LOVE to see these scientifically verifiable facts, because I guarantee that they do NOT poke holes in the theory of evolution. Otherwise there would be NO Theory of Evolution. If there were facts that poked holes in evolution, science would either A: change the theory to fit into these new facts, or B: Toss out the old theory and start from scratch. Since Evolution is still a scientific theory, your facts are either A: accounted for within the theory, or B: scientifically unverifiable.

And PLEASE, no flagellum or irreducibly complex stuff either please, because that ID stuff is WAY old and NOT scientifically verified, NOR verifiable. That is why it is religious and not science.

But, please, feel free to give it your best shot, we'd ALL love to hear it.