Hanging one's hat on the "Prime Mover" argument in refuting evolution certainly seems to be a popular argument any more. Pity it doesn't hold in and of itself, much less as a refutation of some other argument. Not to mention that it is a curious sort of "faith" that requires some variety of "proof" underlying it.
Regrettably, I have only one copy of Kierkegaard's "The Leap of Faith and the Limits of Reason", and am therefore loathe to donate it to the education of others...
