[diode]

Bravo! That's more like it! A true full-throated display!

But of course I should not construe your identification of "workable in between methods" employed by various species as an espousal of a specific evolutionary continuum. No, that would be idiotic of me! That staw man was toppled long ago. After all, your beliefs are valid even if..."Darwinian evolution happens not to be true...and even if God [were] trying his hand at gradualism."

This is certainly a self-important statement even from one such as you. Yours is a trite assumption that the mere exisitence of an animal with particular feature of reproductive anatomy proves your point. You cannot claim that any organ system is an "in between" another unless you have already marked its position on the evolutionary continuum. But of course that was the staw man that I knocked down before, wasn't it.

Being obnoxious takes hard work, but you have made a valiant effort. Is it dawning on you that you have been checkmated, or I have used #435 before?

[Dan Day]

I always like to give people the benefit of the doubt, so rather than just presume the obvious about you, I'll come right out and ask: Do you actually believe this prancing trollish nonsense you type, or do you just enjoy playing a braying jackass on the web? Seriously.