Oh, now that *definitely* deserves an award:
In case you missed it the *first* time you made your ridiculous mischaracterization of what I actually wrote, allow me to repeat my response:
Oh? Where? Quote me. Or retract your idiotic charge. Or just go away and leave the conversation to those with better reading comprehension.The challenge still stands. Pick one of the three choices.
Your foolish "analogy not homology" argument is tiresome.
Only because it took three tries for you to finally describe it correctly. You're wearing *me* out too.
Why not simply admit you have no idea what you are talking about.
Because I don't like lying.
How many peer-reviewed scientific papers have you published?
How many lame non sequiturs have you posted?
Please write me off again.
Very glad to oblige.