Replies

Welcome to the fray. Evolution is junk science but its acolytes avoid discussing this embarrassing truth by attacking Creationism and throwing slurs such as "recycled reading for retards".

They lose the debate on one thread, then migrate to another, calling their kin.

In a few words, the fossil record is full of gaps, more today than ever before, not transitional forms; species remain stable over millions of years, i.e. they exhibit stasis, not change; no credible mechanism of change, none, has been found. As to this latter, the Evolutionists have even tried "chance", which is flat ludicrous. Science is supposed to explain. Chance explains nothing. And on and on ... The Evolutionists have now retreated to the position of ponderously repeating that their "science" is about change over time. Well, guess what? Everything exhibits change over time. Some science.

In a few words, the fossil record is full of gaps, more today than ever before, not transitional forms;

The claim that there are no transitional forms is so thorougly discredited that the claim can only be considered an outright lie. As for 'gaps', well, yes there are more gaps. The difference is that while before there were lots of really big gaps, now there are much smaller ones. Of course, Creationists insist that unless a fossil is found for every single 'intermediate' form between one species and another, evolution is falsified. Nevermind that fossilization isn't that common.

that it is species remain stable over millions of years,

Really? You've observed species for millions of years at a time to test this?

i.e. they exhibit stasis, not change; no credible mechanism of change, none, has been found.

No mechanism for change? If you're going to use faulty arguments, at least resort to something other than outright lies.

As to this latter, the Evolutionists have even tried "chance", which is flat ludicrous. Science is supposed to explain. Chance explains nothing. And on and on ...

I'm not sure what this means? "Chance", if anything, would only refer to changes in an environment which would allow for some organisms to survive based upon their genetic traits while others die off, but you've phrased it so vaguely that I can only assume that you really don't know what you're talking about.

Lots of Evol name calling, back slapping and other childish, hyena-like nonsense on this thread. Maybe a repeat dose of the truth will help ...

... the fossil record is full of gaps, more today than ever before, not transitional forms; species remain stable over millions of years, i.e. they exhibit stasis, not change; no credible mechanism of change, none, has been found. As to this latter, the Evolutionists have even tried "chance", which is flat ludicrous. Science is supposed to explain. Chance explains nothing. And on and on ... The Evolutionists have now retreated to the position of ponderously repeating that their "science" is about change over time. Well, guess what? Everything exhibits change over time. Some science.

But then again, maybe not.