[Hemingway's Ghost]

See, thats the whole in your argument. This girl made a choice and is upset because she had to live with the ramifications of that choice. You liberals always think that there should not be any accountability for your choices. Simple, make a choice and be prepared to live with the consiquences. Not so complicated after all is it.

The girl made a choice, however misguided you or anyone else think her choice was. The law states that people who make this choice cannot be punished by being discriminated against for making this choice. This case is about determining whether or not she was.

Read the stories---the girl didn't do anything. She was punished for what "might" happen. Do you think being barred from attending gym class is an appropriate consequence for choosing lesbianism? Arguably the law doesn't think so . . .

Further, "you liberals"? What the hell do you mean by that?

[JMP]

........The law states that people who make this choice cannot be punished by being discriminated against for making this choice...........
.
The reaction of the sexually normal group of girls is as normal as would the reaction to undressing in front of heterosexual males. Their discomfort is perfectly understandable. They choose to not continue this forced practice. The school acted appropriately. Any judgement that forces the continuance of this practice should result in an impeachment.

Look HM, I believe you are hitting on the constitutional principle, simply stated, that the rights of the individual can not be trampled by the many. It seems we do not agree on who the individual is.
.
.........Further, "you liberals"? What the hell do you mean by that?............
.
I honestly felt like I was arguing with a liberal. I admit that sometimes I get liberals and neocons mixed up.