So? Is the disclaimer false? We're back to square one here.
Interesting that to evolutionists the truth of a statement does not make it valid for publication! Sorta tells you a lot about evolution and evolutionists.
Indeed. At least, it makes me wonder, What are they so damned afraid of?
It's been a fascinating spectacle, to see all the brave defenders of "science" on this thread essentially say that a plain-as-day truth should be suppressed (or at least toned-down) for weird sociological, and perhaps political, considerations. I think it was VadeRetro who brought up "unfairness", and even Physicist made allusions to the "intentions" of the pro-disclaimer side.
Yup, "unfairness" and "intentions", truly SCIENTIFIC concepts indeed! When writing a science book, it's not TRUTH that's important, it's "fairness" and making sure that your "intentions" are correct.
That's SCIENCE!