[gore3000]

When one considers all the numerous absolutely new genes that would have had to arise totally at random to create just the 1.5 million known species, one has to see that evolution is totally impossible because as I say, a chance of a near impossible event can be attributed to luck, a chance of numerous nearly impossible events occurring is totally impossible and a ridiculous assertion.-me-

How many times you gonna sing this song?

Until someone finds a SCIENTIFIC refutation of it. Fairy tales about anything being possible are not such a refutation.

[donh]

Until someone finds a SCIENTIFIC refutation of it. Fairy tales about anything being possible are not such a refutation.

You don't need a SCIENTIFIC refutation of a non-SCIENTIFIC thesis. Quoting me odds without showing me your state-space and selection criteria gives you no warrant of authority about what is and is not a fairy tale.

[js1138]

Until someone finds a SCIENTIFIC refutation of it. Fairy tales about anything being possible are not such a refutation.

If ID is describing itself as science, shouldn't it be trying to falsify itself? Isn't that th way science behaves? Shouldn't ID be actively proposing research that would test the probabilities?