Against that, one No-Kin-To-Monkeys violated the sacred rule of "Thou shalt not bitch-slap a fellow creo." At the time, embroiled in argument with the receiver of the rebuff, I simply thought that the behavior showed that intellectual honesty in a creo was possible after all. What happened next was a revelation. A howl went up from slappee that No-Kin was obviously an impostor.
That proved right. Accused of being that impostor, I authorized the mods to check. I was innocent but somebody else presumably got yelled at. If you're ever going to impersonate a creo, remember "Solidarity over honesty."
Revisionism at its best.
The story actually starts with Vade waxing on about how jennyp had opined about doing what BCMDA described as happening on the other board(an evo masquerading as a creationist --- and vice versa). I replied that it was easy for the evos to do it as they are practiced in the art of misrepesentation. Lo and behold No-kin appears for the first time in about a year. He and Vade participate in a sham colloquy about mammaries(IIRC). During the sham presentation Junior entirely misrepresented a statement by No-kin which I used as an opportunity for further evidence of evo misrepresentation. It was at this point that No-kin supposedly did the dirty deed, described above in the style favored by the Pimp of Prose, Vade. My suspicions already aroused by the fortuitous appearance of the Vade shill, this reaction to a comment I had not posted to No-kin, and not in any way supportive of him in his waltz with the Pimp, satisfied me as to his ersatz status. I took the opportunity later to point that out. For a day or longer this little charade played out [Clack][Clack]. I was right. He was a phony. When No-kin first appeared about a year earlier, PatrickHenry commented that NK looked as if he had come out of central casting. Judge for yourself. Vade is misrepresenting the facts again. It was NK and Vade that were discussing evolution. Junior made a comment misrepresenting No-kin. I answered Junior. No-kin answered me. Vade and No-kin were dog-sniffing. The later "I am Sparticus" comments unmasks the "Solidarity over honesty" practitioners.
Evolutionists deny they are Communists but they sure act like them! They love to lie, they love to rewrite history. Vade's specialty (besides insults) is to claim that something was refuted hundreds of times - on some other thread which he never seems to be able to cite.
While he was apparently exonerated from being no-kin-to-monkeys, the person was found to be an evolutionist posting as an opponent of evolution so that the evolutionists could make fun of opponents. Not only is this using more than one account an utter violation of forum rules (which do not seem to bother the evos as their constant abusive behavior shows) but it is also a totally despicable tactic (also often used by Communists - agents provocateurs) and a great example that nothing is too low or too despciable for them. Your hypocritical statement above I could call a new low for evolutionists but unfortunately there have been so many from you and your friends that it is hard to rate them.
That sure is the evolutionist credo. I remember quite well a thread about a year ago where somewhere in my response I missed typing a 'no'. The evolutionists by knee jerk reaction and totally without thought started attacking my statement (and because of the missing 'no' actually supporting my position). I let it go on for some hundred posts and you are your friends were having a great time 'refuting' me, until I finally pointed out my mistake.