Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: music_code
Decay rates are based on statistics -- over X number of years, Y number of atoms will decay into Z atoms of a daughter isotope. Since we are dealing with hundreds of trillions of atoms, the statistics will bear out. Faster decay rates in the past would definitely leave a mark on the landscape (at least two folks here have pointed out that, based on creationists assumptions, Adam and Eve would have been toast).

Lava flows (and other igneous formations) make great yard sticks for radiometric dating because heated rocks release the daughter isotopes whose ratio is used for dating. Hence, lava can be dated most accurately and rock formations above ancient lava flows would have to be younger, while those below would be older. Also, this is another reason that multiple tests are conducted on the same samples using different methods. Even if there was a skew in one parent-daughter ratio, that exact same skew would not be present in another parent-daughter ratio. If several methods converge on a specific date, odds are that's how old the rock is.

4,398 posted on 01/10/2003 10:59:24 AM PST by Junior (Mary had a little lamb. She tied it to a heater. And every time it turned around...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4385 | View Replies ]


To: Junior
4400?
4,400 posted on 01/10/2003 11:07:07 AM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4398 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson