Your assertion does not prove your assertion. It is perfectly possible to establish a coherent mathematical scheme in which we are on the inner surface of a sphere and the universe extends towards the center of the sphere. Such exercises can burn a bit of computer tim getting all the physical laws adjusted, but they contribute little to understanding.
Does your expansion model make any pridictions that would differ from the predictions of ordinary physics -- for example does it predict anything along the lines of cosmic background radiation or the polarization thereof, that cannot be accomodated by traditional theories. If so, are your predictions quantified and on the table for confirmation or disconfirmation?
Your assertion does not prove your assertion.
I wasn't trying prove my assertion to you or anyone. I am not trying to convince you to see things my way. If you had clicked on the Freeper Views thread, you'd realize it is a collection of views from all who wish to contribute.
The sound waves found in the cosmic background microwave radiation is a confirmation of my view. I predicted a year ago that harmonics lie at the inception of the universe. It is integral to my theory and is grounded in Scripture.
I do not have the credentials to formalize my predictions, but yes I do predict there is an algorithm that lies at the inception of the universe, that harmonics are the mechanism of its operation, that fields are the result, which manifest geometry and dimension, particles, energy etc.
The discovery of sound waves in the cosmic microwave background as it captured the harmonics of the inception of light greatly reinforced my view. And of course, numerous credible physicists sense the algorithmic structure of all that there is and are pursuing it even now.