Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: gore3000
Give me a break G3K, god CANNOT be proven or DISPROVEN, therefore the question is not asked by science.

God is a philisophical/religious notion, NOT a scientific one.

The big bang can be studied directly, through radiotelescopes etc, abiogenisis can be studied directly as well. Are you telling me that science can study god directly as well, don't give me crap about the universe being the creation of god and therefore god can be proven either. That's circular reasoning and you know it.

Can god himself/herself/itself be studied DIRECTLY? If not, it cannot be studied by science. There are NO fossils of god, no fossil light of god, there is no direct evidence of god anywhere, therefore god cannot be studied by science and therefore CANNOT be used by science.

Please, please. please, GET A CLUE....
4,062 posted on 01/08/2003 10:08:38 PM PST by Aric2000 (The Theory of Evolution is Science, ID and Creationism are Religious, Any Questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4057 | View Replies ]


To: Aric2000
Can god himself/herself/itself be studied DIRECTLY?

That something cannot be studied directly does not mean it cannot be studied. Evolutionists claim their theory is science and yet can one study it directly? Can one study natural selection directly? Clearly one cannot. Therefore the claims of Intelligent Design are at least as 'studyable' as those of evolution. Let's remember that one of the arguments Darwin had to refute was that of intelligent design in order to have his theory made acceptable. If ID was not 'studiable' and not scientific, then what need did he have to refute it? Indeed, how could he even claim to refute it?

Can one see design in things made by man? One certainly can. Can such design be studied? Of course it can, it is done all the time and that is how design improvements come about. So why cannot such design be equally studied in nature? I see no reason why it cannot be and indeed such is being done today. We hear everyday of scientists examining how living things deal with certain questions in order to make medicines for example. So yes design can indeed be studied whether it be in things made by man or otherwise.

4,067 posted on 01/08/2003 10:37:54 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4062 | View Replies ]

To: Aric2000
What an evo shill . . . you must have gills // scales - - - webbed hands // feet . . .

serum not working . . . hairy palms // slouching over - - -

feel safe // home swinging through the jungle // feet off of the ground . . .

with your kind // roots // ancestors ? ? ?

Main Entry: 1shill
Pronunciation: 'shil
Function: intransitive verb
Etymology: 2shill
Date: circa 1914
1 : to act as a shill
2 : to act as a spokesperson or promoter the eminent Shakespearean producer, director, actor and star... is now shilling for a brokerage house -- Andy Rooney
>
4,070 posted on 01/08/2003 11:39:20 PM PST by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4062 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson