I have no idea how to construct a testable hypothesis for an algorithm from inception (I suspect that A-G is onto something here...). Do you have any ideas how to go about doing that?
Nevermind that it was ID we were talking about, not Alamo-Girl's assertion about algorithms. :)
I'm convinced there is no testable hypothesis possible for ID and that is why the IDers haven't been able to construct one.
With regard to my hypothesis, I do not have the credentials to take it any further myself - but I believe it can be done. The scope obviously must include inception, so it cannot be taken as a frontal assault of the theory of evolution whose technical definition excludes inception.
I do expect to see testable hypotheses forthcoming for I.D., creationism and directed panspermia.