Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop
Yes, js1138. That's what Doc said, too. On that basis, it will never be publishable. For how is one going to put the Intelligent Designer on the stage such that he/she/it might be "tested?" It seems the Darwinists are insisting they will settle for nothing less, and it (obviously) cannot happen.

You cannot prove or disprove god scientifically, therefore God CANNOT be use in science, how many times must I repeat this before you creationist/ID'rs get it?

Pretty neat way to ditch the whole issue, no?

No, it's creationism trying to get into science through a backdoor. Sorry, if you use god in your thesis then it is NOT science. No matter how many times you claim it is. ID uses god, therefore it can NEVER be considered science.
3,815 posted on 01/08/2003 11:53:23 AM PST by Aric2000 (The Theory of Evolution is Science, ID and Creationism are Religious, Any Questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3753 | View Replies ]


To: Aric2000
You cannot prove or disprove god scientifically, therefore God CANNOT be use in science, how many times must I repeat this before you creationist/ID'rs get it?

Does science credit the idea of causation -- cause and effect?

3,825 posted on 01/08/2003 12:21:54 PM PST by betty boop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3815 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson