ID does not get published because it doesn't have anything to say -- at least not yet. For an ID article to be publishable it would have to make some testable assertion. (It already has asserted that the flagellum is irreducibly complex -- an assertion demonstrated to be false).
Yes, js1138. That's what Doc said, too. On that basis, it will never be publishable. For how is one going to put the Intelligent Designer on the stage such that he/she/it might be "tested?" It seems the Darwinists are insisting they will settle for nothing less, and it (obviously) cannot happen.
Pretty neat way to ditch the whole issue, no?