Because there is a well-financed group of people out to destroy scientific metholodogy. Rather than arguing things out in the literature, this group seems more interested in using legislation to attack science.
Doc, IMHO this is a case of "the pot calling the kettle black."
I understand that ID can't even get published in the literature, or otherwise have a chance to argue its case on the merits in a public forum. The Darwinists who control the journals and publishing houses wouldn't hear of it. And they refuse to engage with ID-ists.
This is not right. This is censorship.