That's true.
If your "well known" theory of Evolution involving Cosmology and biology were "well-known," why have we not seen it published in a scientific journal?
I provided a pro-evo link saying there is a cosmological theory of evolution. But I'm not arguing with you if you want to call it bad science, or even silly.
Actually, you didn't, as my previous posts to you amply, and in great detail, illustrated.
Your links show the usage of the WORD (not Theory of... ) "evolution," meaning "a process of change," can, among many other topics, be applied to Cosmology. In such contexts, the word has no biological connotation at all.
Surely you can't be so obtuse as to not see the point? There is no "well-known biological/cosmological Theory of Evolution" traceable back to Darwin, and your links do not suggest otherwise, as I've explained to you previously.