This is a disingenuous statement. Evolution is presented as dogma in high school textbooks, colleges, universities, the major media, in our entertainment, everywhere. The links you speak of are entirely fabricated.
To say that if you believe in evolution, you cannot be religious, is not only ridiculous, but assinine.
Evolution is itself a religious worldview, for it concerns itself with man's origin. And by the way, it (both the spelling and the theory) is asinine.
Now onto the question of if you believe that it all came about as a huge accident, why shoudl you care? This belief would tell me that life is WORTH MUCH more then if goddidit because if goddidit then he can do it again, but if it is all indeed a cosmic accident, then life is worth a heck of a lot more, because we have one shot here, and that's it, the chances of it happening again are miniscule, whereas if goddidit then who cares, he'll just do it again.
There is a kind of twisted way in which this may seem to make sense, but only if one is willing to make the major league assumption that God would, indeed, 'Do It Again'. Since by definition your worldview excludes God, such an assumption is prohibited and therefore unavailable for the illegitimate usage you have employed here.
If there is no God, life is indeed a meaningless charade which no one can fathom. If evolution is true, then... that a person only gets 'one shot at it' merely serves to increase the sense of urgency felt by those who wish to infuse life with meaning through deeds undertaken with the desire for lasting results that benefit others, and conversely, to increase the sense of despair felt by those who conclude that it is not worth the effort since we are all going to die anyway. Neither of those options is remotely the same as having the real meaning and purpose derived from the correct understanding of man's origin, identity, purpose, morality, and destiny. Such needs require a self-sufficient source of power and goodness that is found only in a Creator.