[Aric2000]

Your misunderstand the nature of God. God didn't spring from anything. He is the creator - self-existent and eternal, outside of time. Your refusal to consider that possibility simply shows that you have a bias against God. If God created all natural laws, that makes God lead scientist.

And you sir misunderstand the nature of science.

The existence of god can neither be proven NOR disproven, therefore Science CANNOT use god. God is religious in nature.

Prove that god exists and then science can use him in theories, but until then, SCIENCE cannot use god. Are we clear yet? Geez, you and Fester, man what a silly conversation this is.

Where are we going next on this little roller coaster ride to no where?

[exmarine]

Prove that god exists and then science can use him in theories, but until then, SCIENCE cannot use god. Are we clear yet? Geez, you and Fester, man what a silly conversation this is.

See my post 3178. Prove that God doesn't exist! YOu take it on faith! Are we clear yet?

[exmarine]

And you sir misunderstand the nature of science.

I suppose only evolutionists can understand science? They have a monopoly on good scientific investigation, right? Again, see my post 3178. YOu ask me to prove the existence of God, but you cannot even prove to me how a protein molecule self-assembled (essential prerequisite for naturalistic evolution), or how information is added to the genome through NS+mutation. I must conclude that in order to understand YOUR brand of science, I would have to understand your worldview first because that is where your view of science comes from.