Natural selection is an algorithm.
My statement ("the presence of algorithm from inception is proof of intelligent design") delimits to "algorithm from inception".
Natural selection applies to material existence and thus follows inception, i.e. null, void, empty, the beginning, first cause. So although I agree that natural selection is an algorithm, it is not an algorithm from inception.
I don't understand your statement: Understand that randomness is biology comes with multiple contingencies.
For instance, ionizing radiation doesn't have a preference for particular bonds in DNA, but because DNA, in situ, is tightly wrapped in chromosomes with associated proteins, the actual effect of free radicals is only on exposed parts of the molecule. It's random, in that it is non-specific or undirected, but the effect of mutations in the DNA are not random.