And it was refuted way back when but you are too dishonest to admit that it has been and refuse to address the points made there which were that since evolutionists are unable to defend evolution on a scientific basis their claim that their adherence to evolution is based on science is totally false. Further, that since the evolutionists here certainly have access to much information from the internet, from books, articles, etc. (and indeed some CLAIM to be scientists themselves) the fact that they are unable to defend their theory against some fairly basic facts disproving it shows that evolution is certainly not a fact as they constantly claim and more likely not worth the electrons with which they defend it so vehemently.
You have never refuted my prior point. I will concede that evolution is not a fact. It is a theory. Anyone who says that evolution is a hard core fact is wrong. But there is evidence which backs it up, which you are too stubborn to admit. But my prior point is that you cannot disprove a well known theory on free republic. You can make a good argument, but you cannot disprove it which you have many times stated. It's laughable to think that.