If you knew that my answer had already been given then why did you ask for it in the post I responded to:
Post #1307 is waiting for an answer.
1584 posted on 12/30/2002 8:04 PM PST by Condorman
Looks more like the usual evolutionist lying in order to smear an opponent. As to the rest of your statements:
Pasteur: Proved only the non-spontaneous generation of fully formed cells.
No, he proved that spontaneous generation did not occur.
Smallest living cell, 1 million base pair example: Based on fully formed cells.
I know, I was being kind to atheists in using only a quarter of the smallest cell known. Some scientists think perhaps a cell of half million bases could sustain life, I halved it again. So yes, as far as we know abiogenesis is far more impossible that stated in my post.
Chicken and egg "problem": concerns fully formed cells.
...and the first life had to be able to reproduce itself, this is not possible without a fully formed cell. So yes abiogenesis is impossible.
Back to the question I've been asking for 400 posts: Upon what evidence do you base this assumption?
I posted that several times before you bothered to notice it. Drawing your attention to that fact is not a lie. Nor is it a smear. It is an accurate reconstruction of your abysmal reading comprehension skills.
Now for the third time, what about post 1372? I'll reconstruct the question if it's too much trouble to look it up.